
"rev. Al Sharpton"
The latest episode in the unfolding political soap opera saga that black “celebrity” leadership and orthodox civil rights leadership continue to engage centers around alleged attacks on Dr. Cornel West by, Dr. Melissa Harris-Perry, a professor at Tulane University and host of a MSNBC weekend show. West characterized the attacks by his former colleague in The Nation and on cable TV as strictly personal.
West is responsible for bringing Dr. Perry to Princeton University in 2006, from the University of Chicago. She held a joint appointment with the Center for African American Studies and the Department of Politics, and she arrived at Princeton with tenure.
West asserts that shortly after Perry arrived, she no longer wanted to teach at the Center for African American Studies and later turned on him and Professor Glaude, chairman of the department, calling them “hypocritical leftists.”
“I love the sister,” West said, “but she is a liar, and I hate lying.” West added that Dr. Perry later said on MSNBC’s The Ed Show, that West attacked Obama’s white mother, in the interview with Truthdig.com. “I don’t talk about people’s mothers. She is reinforcing all of the vicious perceptions of me as a racist, and she knows better than that.”
According to West, Perry’s scathing critique has more to do with the fact that the Center for African American Studies unanimously voted against her when she came up for promotion from associate to full professor, adding that “her work was not scholarly enough.”
“There is not a lot of academic stuff with her, just a lot of twittering,” West said. And he added, “that her book Sister Citizen, released last year, was wild and out of control.” West continued, “She’s become the momentary darling of the liberals, but I pray for her because she’s in over her head. She’s a fake and a fraud. I was so surprised how treacherous the sister was.”
Dr. Boyce Watkins, a “public intellectual” out of Syracuse University, and a neo-celebrity political leader, characterizes Rev. Sharpton and Dr. Perry as two major “pit bulls” of the Obama administration that have been busy trying to silence Black criticism directed toward the White House. As a reward for their work, Boyce Watkins says’ “they were both given shows on MSNBC.” He added, “Sharpton in particular is too close than a civil rights leader probably should to a United States President.”
Watkins initially injected himself into the political rift among competing contingents of the popular unelected black leadership on the

"DR. Boyce Watkins"
neutral side in support for the Sharpton position. However, he has apparently migrated to advocate the position held by West and his (West’”) comrade in arms, Tavis Smiley. Although Watkins claims to have serious political reservations relative to Smiley, because of Smiley’s connections to the Clinton’s, Watkins was not successful in negotiating a position on center stage with political gatekeeper Sharpton. Hence, Watkins seems comfortable in the political orbit of West, notwithstanding the Tavis Smiley component.
The political fratricide between Rev. Sharpton and Professor West surfaced in early May of 2011 during a panel discussion on the MSNBC’s “The Ed Shultz Show.” An article about the spectacle was posited on BlackPoliticalTaskforce.org, “The ongoing black political saga was animated to greater heights as the 2012 election season opened with a controversy that was ignited on cable TV with the glib tongues and quick political wits of Professor Cornel West and Rev. Al Sharpton, on a recent MSNBC Show hosted by Ed Schultz. The clash of these popular political Titans is the latest rendition and spectacle of the internal debate that has been percolating beneath the politically correct surface, since the election of President Barack Obama.”
Since the advent of the Barack Obama presidential campaign and his subsequent victory in election 2008, there has been a political crescendo emanating from the grassroots of the black community, pertinent to the political road ahead. Following the stunning victory that ushered in the first black American as president of the United States, the black community in particular finds itself in a political paradox, going forward.
The victory of President Obama in election 2008, may be compared to the victory of the civil rights movement following the enactment of the civil rights and voting rights legislation of 1964 and 1965, respectively… In the wake of the successes of the civil rights movement came the marginalization of the civil rights leadership by 1967. And the assassination of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968 was the decisive political blow that marked the end of the modern civil rights movement.
Subsequently, “responsible” civil rights leaders became in vogue, as the “responsible” Negro leadership and the black “militant” and “radical” political leadership, became mired in a fratricidal exercise. At the end of the day, the legitimate political aspirations of both elements of the black American leadership was truncated by the sophisticated nature of the American political process, and covert operations that were targeted against certain elements in the black community such as: COINTELPRO…

"Prof. Cornell West"
During this initial post civil rights period the “responsible” Negro leadership and the “militant” and “radical” leadership resorted to pejorative name calling among other sophomoric interactions. In the process, over the ensuing years, the number of black elected officials proliferated around the country, which is a legacy of the civil rights movement. On the other hand, the political gains of the civil rights movement were either hollowed out, marginalized or unenforced. Currently, black American elected officials are generally isolated from the black community at large and remain politically accountable to the special interests that underwrite their reelection campaigns.
The political dichotomy that characterizes the current crop of black American unelected leaders is comparable to the divisions of old, including the pejorative name calling and public vituperation. Rev. Sharpton responded to Professor West’s verbal assault against his former colleague, Professor Melissa Harris-Perry, on behalf of Perry, and the public exchange of personal invectives continues to frame popular black politics. In the wake of this political spectacle and entertainment value of the stereotypical black American comedy, the real-time progress associated with the first African American President of the United States is obscured. Unfortunately, the popular black political leadership is stuck on politics 101.
Accordingly, a gaggle of black American “celebrity” political leaders, professors, educators, entertainers, and sport figures, has staked out competing sides representing their political positions with respect to presidential election 2012. Apparently, the political and electoral discourse in the black community is thus engaged and is conducted over popular media and also over the heads of the grassroots black community at large. Hence between the political “talented tenth,” and the popular media, black politics and the electoral discourse have been hijacked.
Interestingly enough, although there are many divergent political views among the “talented tenth” but there seems to be a general political consensus among them, relative to the “black agenda” going forward. According to Dr. Boyce Watkins, the founder of YourBlackWorld.com, President Obama, and other seekers of elective office must address the black agenda, in the context of the “PERM.” When describing the “PERM” agenda, Watkins referenced the hair “perm” that Sharpton is noted for, which “is the best perm I’ve ever seen.”
Watkins describes the PERM agenda as, “Poverty, Educational inequality, Racial inequality, and Mass incarceration.” Referencing Sharpton as a “salesman for the Obama administration”, Watkins speaking with his supporters and other representatives of the “talented tenth,” admonished political operatives (Sharpton) not to expect him to vote for a candidate that does not embrace the “black agenda” in the context of the PERM initiative.
The political dichotomy in the black leadership is generally positioned as Sharpton, et al. (civil rights orthodoxy), and his contingent

"Tavis Smiley"
of “celebrity” political leaders are vociferous supporters of President Obama. Juxtaposed to the Sharpton contingent is Professor Cornel West and other black celebrity political leaders who assert that Obama must be held accountable to an agenda targeted to the poor, in particular. Moreover, the strategy and tactical approach utilized by advocates for the poor have been taken directly from the civil rights chronicles.
Interestingly enough, President Obama did not engage the black civil rights orthodoxy during his campaign for his party’s presidential nomination and his ultimate victory in election 2008. Therefore, Obama’s first term has not been colored, influenced, or politicized by the tactics of civil rights era political organizing techniques. Consequently, the President is unlikely to be politically influenced during his reelection campaign by the conventional civil rights agenda, or the protestations from the neo celebrity black leadership, and the prevailing talented tenth.
President Obama demonstrated his unique political wisdom and skill when he tapped Rev. Sharpton to manage the “black political desk.” Sharpton has credentials as a civil rights leader, and is a consummate political gatekeeper able to successfully manage the aggressive political insurgent leadership of emerging black celebrities as well as “designated” political leaders. Sharpton, some political analysts suggest, represents the last generation of community based civil right leaders and has a decided advantage over his varied political detractors because they are locked into the bygone civil rights organizing and political tactics. And the current demographic in the black community has no linkage or affinity to the political rhetoric and sensibility that hallmarks the civil rights period. The civil rights political paradigm is based on outdated racial and minority community juxtapositions.
The most recent political furor directed at Sharpton is that he defended his close relationship with the president by equating it with the relationship that Frederick Douglas had with President Lincoln, A. Phillip Randolph with President Roosevelt, and Dr. King with Presidents Kennedy and Johnson. Sharpton’s political detractors are publically irate with him for equating his connection with Obama with the aforementioned icons of black American political history.
In particular, Professor West, in conjunction with representatives of the talented tenth, and a contingent of black clergy are chagrined with the idea of Sharpton as the 21st century MLK Jr. According to West, Sharpton is not speaking truth to power, which is the principle of King’s relationship with Presidents Kennedy and Johnson. Likewise, West concluded, “I come out of a Black prophetic tradition that has a commitment to truth and justice. The condition of truth is to allow suffering to speak.”
Just prior to the death of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., he suggested the black political leadership suffered from the “paralysis of analysis.” MLK’s observation may still hold true, and President Obama may be hip to that…
Gary James is an author, and analyst. He was a professional organizer in the civil rights movement as a staff organizer in New York City for the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO), under the leadership of the late Dr. George Wiley.